The free speech issue in eldred was whether extending the term of. Lawrence lessig argued the cause for the petitioner theodore. Internet publisher eric eldred was the lead petitioner, and was joined by a group of commercial and noncommercial interests who relied on the public domain for their work including dover publications and many amici including the free software foundation, the american association of law libraries, the bureau of national affairs, and the. Supreme court today ruled 72 that congress was within its rights when it passed legislation to extend. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. The constitutional law of intellectual property after. Ashcroft, as decided by the supreme court in january 2003 added another chapter regarding the relationship between law and freedom of speech to the judicial chain novel that has been in the writing for the past three decades. His company, eldritch press began in 1995 and his website offered the literary versions to the public for free, and offered a forum in which scholars across the globe could discuss the works and even offer their own derivative works. Eldred and the case for constitutionality of the mathers act b. The court also held that there are no first amendment rights to use the ed works. The majority never explained how a precedent that would permit the perpetuation of protection in increments is somehow more constitutional than one which did it in one fell swoop. Introduction the supreme courts decision in eldred v. The lead petitioner, eric eldred, is an internet publisher. Eldred and the case for unconstitutionality of the mathers act 16 v.
Ashcroft in its fall term for background on the case, please visit the openlaw eldred v. Ashcroft, as decided by the supreme court in january 2003 added. Ashcroft supreme court of the united states 2003 eric eldred, et al. Eric eldred was an internet publisher of literary works in the public domain. You may also want to visit lead plaintiff eric eldred s eldritch press and an article from the boston globe magazine l e g a l d o c u m e n t s supreme court docket. On writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the. World heritage encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most. Cornell findlaw justia library of congress oral argument before the supreme court, in mp3 format. Times prescription and the first amendments free speech guarantee. This file is also available in postscript and pdf formats. Justice ginsburg delivered the opinion of the court.
Syllabus, opinion ginsburg, dissent stevens, dissent breyer. For published works with existing s as of that date, the 1976 act granted a term of 75 years from the date of publication, 304a and b, a 19year increase over the 56year term applicable under the 1909 act. The original plaintiff of record is eric eldred, the proprietor of the unincorporated eldritch press, a website which republishes the works of others which are not protected by. A majority of the court of appeals also upheld the ctea against. Supreme court decision on eldred v ashcroft breyer j. This case concerns the authority the constitution assigns to congress to prescribe the duration of s. Supreme court decision on eldred v ashcroft us copyright office. But eldred also included novel and interesting elements that offer a new direction to the discourse of the conflict, or at least a potential for redirection. When working in tandem, these provisions mutually reinforce each other, the first serving as an. Furthermore, given crucial distinctions between patents and s, one cannot extract from language in the courts patent decisionslanguage not trained on a grants durationgenuine support for petitioners quid pro quo argument. Justice stevens stresses the rejection of a proposed amendment to the statute of anne that would have extended the term of existing s, v. Eldreds aftermath university of michigan law school scholarship.
Eldred was joined by a group of commercial and noncommercial interests who relied on the public domain for their work. United states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit citation. Ashcroft, in his official capacity as attorney general, respondent. Eldred v ashcroft home sources sitemap whatsnew help ericeldred,etal,petitionersv. Ashcroft opinion of the court january 1, 1978, regardless of when the works were created. At the same time, a particular statute that exceeds. Ashcroft this file is also available in postscript and pdf formats. Ashcroft, as decided by the supreme court in january 2003, added another chapter regarding the relationship between law and freedom of speech to the judicial chain novel that has been in the writing for the past three decades.
However, the suit was brought by a group of activist law professors, including lawrence lessig, charles nesson, and jonathan zittrain. The constitutional law of intellectual property after eldred v. And in this case the failings of degree are so serious that they amount to failings of constitutional kind. Congress extended the authorized term of a copy right to the authors lifetime plus seventy years.
In the supreme court of the united states eric eldred, et. Plaintiffs contend that the congressional statute violates existing law, which requires a stronger limitation for the length of s. The external, free speech argument was internalized, but with drawing some. Introduction the past decade has witnessed an extraordinary blossoming of scholarship on the constitutional law of intellectual property,1 much of which focuses on law. Ashcroft certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit.
Petitioners are various individuals and businesses that rely upon speech in the public domain for their creative work and livelihood. Syllabus opinion ginsburg dissent stevens dissent breyer html version pdf version. Ashcroft offered the supreme court broad issues about the. Copyright, the court reasoned, does not impermissibly restrict free speech, for it grants the author an exclusive right only to the specific form of. The constitutionality of the copyright term extension act by michael jones on january 15, 2003, the supreme court upheld the constitutionality. Eldred v ashcroft pdf writer download eldred v ashcroft pdf writer read online oct 9, 2002 ashcroft and its aftermath, queensland university of. Ashcroft syllabus striction because the cteas terms, though longer than the 1976 acts terms, are still limited, not perpetual, and therefore fit within congress discretion.
32 398 1271 1680 1161 171 270 91 3 1543 1565 84 1687 1027 695 957 192 958 911 733 1680 886 94 794 624 93 308 1365 1212 742 145 22 651 1258 1540 444 1278 669 109 924 752 336 1329 1392 220 417 787